If a system is in equilibrium, which statement is accurate?

In a system that is in equilibrium, it is essential to understand that all forces and moments acting on the system are balanced. When the moments (or torques) balance each other out, it means that the net moment acting on the system is zero. This balance prevents any rotational movement, which is the defining characteristic of equilibrium.

In mechanical and engineering contexts, when a system is described as being in equilibrium, it can be at rest or moving at a constant velocity, but the key point is that there is no angular acceleration; hence, the system does not rotate. Therefore, the accurate statement about a system in equilibrium is that it will not rotate because the moments in the system balance each other out.

This understanding reflects the principles of static equilibrium, particularly in the context of rotational dynamics, where both translational forces and moments must be considered.